B1
Test Automation Strategy & Framework Design
Know what to automate, which tools to use, and what coverage to target — before writing a single test.

Most automation initiatives fail because of strategy, not execution. Teams pick the wrong framework, automate the wrong tests, or build suites too brittle to maintain. The Testyr.ai strategy engagement prevents all three. We assess your QA maturity, engineering team, release cadence, and defect history — then design a framework and roadmap your engineers will actually follow.

You receive a written framework recommendation, phased roadmap with coverage targets, tool evaluation matrix, and an implementation guide your team can act on independently.

Why this matters: Most automation initiatives fail because the wrong framework was chosen up front. A strategy engagement costs a fraction of a framework migration — and framework migrations are common.
Tools Evaluated & Recommended
Playwright Cypress Postman Mabl Testim TestRail Xray Linear
What's Delivered
  • QA maturity assessment across 6 dimensions with scored baseline
  • Framework recommendation with rationale for your specific stack
  • Tool evaluation matrix: 3–5 options compared across 10 criteria
  • Phased automation roadmap with coverage targets per phase
  • Projected defect reduction by coverage tier
  • Implementation guide with CI/CD integration specifications
Not sure where to start? A strategy engagement gives you a clear, costed plan before you write a single test.
Get a Proposal
B2
Functional & Regression Test Automation
Turn a multi-day manual regression cycle into a 45-minute CI run.

Manual regression is slow, inconsistent, and doesn't scale. We build automated E2E regression suites using Playwright or Cypress that cover your critical user journeys, run on every PR, and catch regressions before they reach production.

Every suite includes CI/CD integration, test documentation, a maintenance guide, and 30 days of post-launch support. Built with robust selectors and intelligent waits — not brittle scripts that break on every UI change.

The math: A team spending 4 days on manual regression per release recovers roughly 3 engineering days per sprint when that cycle is automated — worth $40–80K annually at senior engineer rates.
Tools & Platforms
Playwright Cypress Appium Applitools GitHub Actions GitLab CI CircleCI Allure
What's Included
  • User journey mapping and critical path identification
  • Full E2E test suite to agreed coverage scope
  • CI/CD integration with parallel execution configuration
  • Test reporting with failure screenshots and traces
  • Test maintenance guide and pattern documentation
  • Engineer training session (2 hours minimum)
  • 30-day post-launch support
Running a days-long manual regression? We can scope a replacement suite in a single call.
Get a Proposal
B3
API & Integration Testing Automation
Catch breaking API changes in CI — before they reach customers or downstream systems.

API failures cascade silently through downstream systems before anyone notices. We build automated API test suites covering correctness, contract compliance, auth, error handling, and schema validation — integrated into CI so breaking changes surface on PRs, not in production.

For teams with third-party integrations, we implement consumer-driven contract tests with Pact. For internal APIs, we provide OpenAPI validation and schema regression coverage.

The problem it solves: API failures that surface in production are expensive to diagnose under pressure. Catching them in CI — before the deploy — is the entire point.
Tools & Frameworks
Postman Newman Pact REST-assured OWASP ZAP Spectral Prism Supertest
What's Covered
  • Endpoint functional testing: happy path and error scenarios
  • Schema validation against OpenAPI specification
  • Authentication and authorization testing
  • Consumer-driven contract testing with Pact (where applicable)
  • Rate limiting and error handling coverage
  • Security header and OWASP coverage for public APIs
APIs breaking without warning? We'll build the coverage that catches them first.
Get a Proposal
B4
Performance & Load Testing
Know your limits before a campaign, peak season, or investor demo — not during one.

Most teams discover their performance limits when traffic spikes unexpectedly. By then, it's too late. We design and execute load test scenarios that simulate real-world traffic at scale — finding the breaking point, the bottleneck components, and the remediation path before you're in production crisis mode.

We design profiles from your actual traffic data, run tests on your target infrastructure, and deliver a report identifying exactly what degrades first — with prioritized remediation recommendations.

The math: A 4-hour production performance incident at $5M ARR typically costs $20–60K in engineering time and revenue impact. Performance testing costs a fraction of that.
Tools & Platforms
k6 Gatling Locust Datadog APM Grafana New Relic Artillery AWS Load Testing
Test Scenarios Covered
  • Baseline load: normal traffic volume with response time SLA validation
  • Stress test: ramp-up to 5–20x normal load to find breaking point
  • Spike test: sudden traffic surge simulation (campaigns, PR events)
  • Soak test: sustained load over 2–4 hours to detect memory leaks
  • Bottleneck analysis: queries, cache hit rates, API response times
  • Remediation recommendations with priority ranking
Launching a campaign or planning for peak season? Know your limits before traffic makes the decision.
Get a Proposal
B5
QA Managed Services
Senior QA engineering embedded in your team — without the overhead of hiring and retaining full-time headcount.

Test suites degrade as products change. Without active investment, even well-built coverage becomes flaky and abandoned. We embed a senior QA engineering team in your product org on a monthly retainer — maintaining coverage, validating releases, writing new tests for new features, and reporting quality metrics weekly.

Most managed QA clients get the effective depth of a 2–3 person internal QA team at roughly 40–60% of the cost — no benefits, no onboarding overhead, no turnover risk.

The economics: A senior QA automation engineer runs $130–180K fully loaded. A managed retainer delivers the same ongoing coverage at roughly 40–60% of that cost — with no hiring lag and no turnover risk.
Management Stack
Playwright TestRail Jira Linear Allure GitHub Actions Slack Custom Dashboards
What's Included Each Month
  • Continuous suite maintenance as your product changes
  • Release validation with sign-off report before each deploy
  • Monthly capacity hours for new coverage as features ship
  • Weekly quality report: coverage, flake rate, defect escape rate, suite health
  • Defect triage support with reproduction steps
  • Quarterly QA roadmap review with expansion plan
Already have some test coverage? We can take over management and expand it from day one.
Get a Proposal

Services at a glance.

Match your situation to the right service — or book a free assessment for a recommendation.

Service Best For Timeline Starting Price Primary Outcome
B1 — Test Strategy Teams starting from scratch or rebuilding their QA approach 2–4 weeks $4,000 Framework recommendation, phased roadmap, tool matrix
B2 — Regression Automation Teams running multi-day manual regression cycles 30 days (first suite) $8,000 E2E regression in CI — 85–95% cycle time reduction
B3 — API Testing Teams with undocumented APIs or integration failures in prod 2–6 weeks $6,000 Automated API coverage in CI — catch breaking changes pre-deploy
B4 — Performance Testing Teams ahead of campaigns, launches, or peak traffic events 2–4 weeks $5,000 Performance baseline, breaking point analysis, remediation roadmap
B5 — QA Managed Services Teams needing ongoing QA depth without headcount overhead Monthly retainer $3,000/mo 90%+ suite health, 50–70% defect rate reduction in 90 days

Not sure which service fits?

Start with a free assessment. We'll identify your highest risk and recommend where to begin — no commitment required.

No sales pitch. No commitment. Just clarity.