Five services. One firm. Fewer bugs in production.
Scoped transparently, measured against targets, first suite live in 30 days.
Most automation initiatives fail because of strategy, not execution. Teams pick the wrong framework, automate the wrong tests, or build suites too brittle to maintain. The Testyr.ai strategy engagement prevents all three. We assess your QA maturity, engineering team, release cadence, and defect history — then design a framework and roadmap your engineers will actually follow.
You receive a written framework recommendation, phased roadmap with coverage targets, tool evaluation matrix, and an implementation guide your team can act on independently.
- QA maturity assessment across 6 dimensions with scored baseline
- Framework recommendation with rationale for your specific stack
- Tool evaluation matrix: 3–5 options compared across 10 criteria
- Phased automation roadmap with coverage targets per phase
- Projected defect reduction by coverage tier
- Implementation guide with CI/CD integration specifications
Manual regression is slow, inconsistent, and doesn't scale. We build automated E2E regression suites using Playwright or Cypress that cover your critical user journeys, run on every PR, and catch regressions before they reach production.
Every suite includes CI/CD integration, test documentation, a maintenance guide, and 30 days of post-launch support. Built with robust selectors and intelligent waits — not brittle scripts that break on every UI change.
- User journey mapping and critical path identification
- Full E2E test suite to agreed coverage scope
- CI/CD integration with parallel execution configuration
- Test reporting with failure screenshots and traces
- Test maintenance guide and pattern documentation
- Engineer training session (2 hours minimum)
- 30-day post-launch support
API failures cascade silently through downstream systems before anyone notices. We build automated API test suites covering correctness, contract compliance, auth, error handling, and schema validation — integrated into CI so breaking changes surface on PRs, not in production.
For teams with third-party integrations, we implement consumer-driven contract tests with Pact. For internal APIs, we provide OpenAPI validation and schema regression coverage.
- Endpoint functional testing: happy path and error scenarios
- Schema validation against OpenAPI specification
- Authentication and authorization testing
- Consumer-driven contract testing with Pact (where applicable)
- Rate limiting and error handling coverage
- Security header and OWASP coverage for public APIs
Most teams discover their performance limits when traffic spikes unexpectedly. By then, it's too late. We design and execute load test scenarios that simulate real-world traffic at scale — finding the breaking point, the bottleneck components, and the remediation path before you're in production crisis mode.
We design profiles from your actual traffic data, run tests on your target infrastructure, and deliver a report identifying exactly what degrades first — with prioritized remediation recommendations.
- Baseline load: normal traffic volume with response time SLA validation
- Stress test: ramp-up to 5–20x normal load to find breaking point
- Spike test: sudden traffic surge simulation (campaigns, PR events)
- Soak test: sustained load over 2–4 hours to detect memory leaks
- Bottleneck analysis: queries, cache hit rates, API response times
- Remediation recommendations with priority ranking
Test suites degrade as products change. Without active investment, even well-built coverage becomes flaky and abandoned. We embed a senior QA engineering team in your product org on a monthly retainer — maintaining coverage, validating releases, writing new tests for new features, and reporting quality metrics weekly.
Most managed QA clients get the effective depth of a 2–3 person internal QA team at roughly 40–60% of the cost — no benefits, no onboarding overhead, no turnover risk.
- Continuous suite maintenance as your product changes
- Release validation with sign-off report before each deploy
- Monthly capacity hours for new coverage as features ship
- Weekly quality report: coverage, flake rate, defect escape rate, suite health
- Defect triage support with reproduction steps
- Quarterly QA roadmap review with expansion plan
Services at a glance.
Match your situation to the right service — or book a free assessment for a recommendation.
| Service | Best For | Timeline | Starting Price | Primary Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 — Test Strategy | Teams starting from scratch or rebuilding their QA approach | 2–4 weeks | $4,000 | Framework recommendation, phased roadmap, tool matrix |
| B2 — Regression Automation | Teams running multi-day manual regression cycles | 30 days (first suite) | $8,000 | E2E regression in CI — 85–95% cycle time reduction |
| B3 — API Testing | Teams with undocumented APIs or integration failures in prod | 2–6 weeks | $6,000 | Automated API coverage in CI — catch breaking changes pre-deploy |
| B4 — Performance Testing | Teams ahead of campaigns, launches, or peak traffic events | 2–4 weeks | $5,000 | Performance baseline, breaking point analysis, remediation roadmap |
| B5 — QA Managed Services | Teams needing ongoing QA depth without headcount overhead | Monthly retainer | $3,000/mo | 90%+ suite health, 50–70% defect rate reduction in 90 days |
Not sure which service fits?
Start with a free assessment. We'll identify your highest risk and recommend where to begin — no commitment required.
No sales pitch. No commitment. Just clarity.