Your engineers burn days on
manual regression.
Those days become 45 minutes. Production bugs become rare. We're live in 30 days.
Built to prevent defects, not just find them.
Why most test suites get abandoned — and what we do differently.
Tests run on every PR — not manually, not post-merge. Feedback before the merge is the only feedback that prevents defects.
Robust selectors, intelligent waits. A flaky suite gets ignored. We build suites that last.
We track defect escape rate, regression time, and coverage. Outcomes, not test counts.
100 high-risk tests beat 1,000 edge cases. We prioritize by business risk, not volume.
One firm. Five QA capabilities.
From first test strategy to ongoing management — the full QA function, without the headcount.
QA maturity assessment, tool selection, and a phased automation roadmap — before your team writes a single test.
Learn more →Automated E2E suites that turn a multi-day manual regression into a 45-minute CI run.
Learn more →API and integration coverage in CI — catch breaking changes before your customers do.
Learn more →Know your load limits before traffic makes the decision for you.
Learn more →Senior QA engineering embedded in your team — suite maintenance, release validation, weekly quality metrics.
Learn more →First test suite in 30 days. Guaranteed.
Four structured weeks. Working coverage in your CI pipeline.
QA maturity evaluation, defect history review, stack analysis, written baseline report.
Framework selection, coverage scope, phased roadmap with projected targets.
Test suite built and integrated into CI/CD. Documentation and training included.
Quality metrics report: defect escape rate, regression time, coverage %, flake rate — before vs. after.
What test automation delivers.
Industry benchmarks for engineering teams that move from manual to automated regression testing.
The typical range for engineering teams that replace manual-only QA with automated E2E coverage, based on published industry data from Playwright and Cypress adoption studies.
Industry BenchmarkA 4-day manual regression cycle is common in teams shipping weekly without automation. A well-built automated suite running in CI typically completes the same coverage in 30–60 minutes.
Industry BenchmarkEvery Testyr.ai engagement is scoped to deliver a working, CI-integrated test suite within 30 days. This is our delivery guarantee — not an average.
Our GuaranteeA team spending 4 days on manual regression per release recovers roughly 3 engineering days per sprint when that cycle is automated — worth $40–80K annually at typical senior engineer rates.
Industry BenchmarkBuilt for teams where manual QA is the bottleneck.
We work with CTOs and VP Engineering — SaaS, e-commerce, fintech, healthtech — who ship software regularly but rely on manual regression that takes days and still misses things.
Not the right fit for teams with solid existing automation, or those looking for offshore manual QA at a low hourly rate. Right for engineering leaders who know the release process is the problem — and want it fixed.
Ready to cut regression time?
Free assessment. We identify your quality risk and what automation returns — before you commit to anything.
No sales pitch. No commitment. Just clarity.